Anti-Casino Action Validated

We had our day in court for December’s anti-casino action. Thirteen of us drove to Harrisburg to attend District court in Dauphin County.

We were charged with creating “a hazard offensive condition which served no legitimate purpose…” You can see the exact wording on the citation.

We sat in front of Judge Joseph S. Solomon in Dauphin County District court.

Our lawyer argued that our only intent was to retrieve documents. The PGCB is a state agency and is charged with making its documents available to the public. We are nothing more than citizens exercising our rights.

Paul Mauro, identified only as a Supervisor at the PGCB, testified on behalf of the PGCB. He testified that that we were shouting and blocked the entry to the elevators. He further testified that he told us that the PGCB did not want us here and we would need to leave.

The Hallwatch video clearly shows that we were non-violent and respectful.

Reverend Jesse Brown was called to testify on our behalf. He testified that we were citizens who arrived during the PGCB’s regular business hours to request public documents. We were refused access to these documents. When we refused to leave without the documents we were arrested. He testified that the security guard did not offer to contact anyone from the PGCB.

Judge Solomon delivered his verdict:

He said the key to his decision is that “…no testimony showed that there was an intent to create a hazardous condition. If such a condition was created it was done without intent.”

Judge Solomon continued: “The problem I have with this situation is that a request was made for information that should be made available to the people.” He stated that this is a “people’s government” and “…anyone should be able to go to a state government agency, walk in and be able to see the documents. I can’t imagine what documents your [indicating Mauro] agency has that they need to be protected from the people…This was handled extremely inappropriately by your agency…If your agency continues to operate in this fashion we’re going to have a lot more of these [referring to our case].”

He continued, accusing the PGCB of “…creating an undue burden on the citizens of Harrisburg…” by refusing citizens entry and calling the police. He told Mauro that if his [Mauro’s] agency is unable to allow public access due to building security policy then the PGCB should consider moving out of the building.

The judge openly chastised the PGCB. I can’t express enough how moving this scene was. Not only were we found innocent but we were justified not as activists but as citizens exercising our rights.

We are not activists, we are citizens who want the rights that we are due. We are due a say in our government. If we are denied that right we will stand up for it.

I can’t thank the organizers of this event enough for showing me the beginnings of how to make a difference in government. It takes time but a group of concerned citizens can make a difference in their government.

Links:
NABR: http://www.nabrhood.org
Casino Free Philadelphia: http://casinofreephila.org

This entry was posted in Casinos on by .

About morgan

Morgan is a freelance IT consultant living in Philadelphia. He lives with his girlfriend in an old house in Fishtown that they may never finish renovating. His focus is enterprise Messaging (think email) and Directory. Many of his customers are education, school districts and Universities. He also gets involved with most aspects of enterprise Linux and UNIX (mostly Solaris) administration, Perl, hopefully Ruby, PHP, some Java and C programming. He holds a romantic attachment to software development though he spends most of his time making software work rather than making software. He rides motorcycles both on and off the track, reads literature with vague thoughts of giving up IT to teach English literature.

2 thoughts on “Anti-Casino Action Validated

  1. Ken Gregory

    Here is your message:

    Hey, Morgan
    whats up my document searching brotha?

    The link for “Why you should own a mac” links to the same article as “step by step”. Since your right side bar seems to populate dynamically for different views I don’t see the links appearing in the same spot consistently.

    I’m not clear why WinSCP is needed. Around here I can just put the IP address of a Mac straight into an Explorer address bar. As long as SMB agrees on both machines I recall that it works pretty well. Port 445 i think.

    Along the Jaguar, Panther, Tiger trail there were times when I was convinced that SMB compatibility with XP was broken, but lately it just works.

    My biggest problem is reaching PCs when I’m on a Mac. Fortunately my boss can use his Mac to reach my Windows Server. When I’m running a Mac I’m consistently annoyed with the “connect to server feature”.

  2. duran

    Hey there.
    I read this in the news and it gave me a little hope.
    thanks again for the time in jail, it got the media’s attention, and the judge’s response sure did as well.

    I can imagine how validating that was.
    ;)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *